Depleted South Africa brace for fight to maintain proud record

A squad missing a number of prominent names will need to come through a serious test of skill and resolve if South Africa are to extend their run of not having lost a Test series in England in this millennium

Firdose Moonda04-Jul-2017Five years ago, 15 men travelled from the southern tip of Africa to the upper edges of the northern hemisphere on a mission to claim the Test mace. Only five have returned.Hashim Amla, JP Duminy, Faf du Plessis, Morne Morkel and Vernon Philander are the only members of South Africa’s 2012 Test tour of England that are back in 2017. This time, the incentive is not quite as impressive – even if South Africa win the series 4-0, they will not be able to move from their No.2 spot though they would close the gap on India to one point – but the interest is just as high.Even in an environment where, as the MCC put it less than an hour after South Africa’s training session, international cricket is facing a “looming potential crisis”, playing Test cricket in England is still a big deal for South Africa. It’s where names are made (think Graeme Smith), it’s where records are remembered (think Hashim Amla) and “it’s a tour you want to be part of,” according to Russell Domingo, South Africa’s coach. And why not?This millennium, South Africa have had more success in England than any other touring team. They are the only visiting side to have won more than they have lost and they have triumphed twice as many times as they have been defeated. Since 2000, South Africa have not lost a series in England, with a drawn series and two victories, each historic in their own right. In 2008, South Africa claimed a first series win in England since readmission; in 2012, they took the top Test ranking too.Settled squads and serious planning have been important ingredients in their performances. In 2012, they took that to the extreme and prepared with a camp in Switzerland under the guidance of adventurer Mike Horn. South Africa trekked through the Alps to build character and cycled through the town of Chateau-d’Oex to develop endurance. They came to England so solid in their mindset that not even a career-ending injury to Mark Boucher in the first tour game could shake them. This time, some would argue, they’re both shaken and stirred.South Africa’s build-up to the Tests has involved nothing but cricket. They’ve played in an ODI series, in an ICC tournament and a T20 series, and have lost in all of them. They’ve had to deal with whispers about the future of their ODI captain and louder calls over the continuation (or not) of their coach. It’s far from the serenity of Switzerland and, you would think, far from an ideal environment in which to begin a big series.But Domingo, who has since confirmed his reapplication for his post, has to say that the perceived current climate – of a team down on its luck and lacking motivation – is merely a consequence of circumstance. “It was always going to be a long summer, it was always going to be a long three months in England whether you are winning or losing,” he said. “But there are a whole host of new players that will bring unbelievable energy.”Although that is not strictly speaking the case, because those who are new to the squad have either been with the A side or on the county circuit, a change in personnel usually refreshes an outfit. Vernon Philander is one of those “new players” who was not part of any of the limited-overs losses and also used the word “energy” to describe the mood but, curiously, he harked back to the team-building exercise held in August last year as a key factor in preparation”Thinking back to 2012, we had a culture camp before we came here. We had something similar a couple of months ago. There’s a whole lot of new faces which brings a whole lot of new energy into the side. As long as you have energy to burn there’s excitement going into the Test series,” Philander said.The team-building exercise Philander is referring to was held almost a year ago, ahead of the 2016-17 season. It’s unlikely that an event held that long ago would still have an effect on the team now, but consider the initial outcomes. South Africa, then ranked No. 7 in Test cricket and fresh off being booted out of a tri-series in the Caribbean in the league stage, won all eight trophies on offer last season.Temba Bavuma (20 Tests) and Quinton de Kock (19) are representative of a South Africa side low on experience but high on potential•Cricket Australia/Getty ImagesThey climbed to No.2 in Tests with wins over New Zealand (home and away) Australia (away) and Sri Lanka (home). They rose to No.1 in ODIs with whitewashes of Australia and Sri Lanka and though that counted for nothing come major-tournament time, it earned them a lot of goodwill. Before leaving for the UK, South Africa were considered a team on the up. Though their white-ball results have led to the return of some past concerns over their temperament under pressure, South Africa have always seemed a completely different unit as a Test side. They thrive when it’s tough.Not Ashwell Prince’s broken thumb in Australia in 2008, not Smith’s broken hand later in the series, not Jacques Kallis’ broken ribs against India at home in early 2011, not Dale Steyn’s broken shoulder against Australia last year – none of these have been able to stop South Africa from battling. In fact, things like that have spurred them on.There are no major injuries this time but there are many absentees. Steyn is still recovering, de Villiers is on a sabbatical, and the new leader du Plessis has been forced to sit out the first Test after the arrival of his first child. While South Africa have got used to being without de Villiers and Steyn, losing du Plessis will test them in another way. It will ask them to be as good as they have been before without something they have always had before: a strong leader.That’s not to say Dean Elgar, whose personality is reminiscent of Smith’s in many ways, won’t take to the job; it is simply to point out that he has not done it much before. In fact, Elgar has only captained in seven first-class games. It is also a comment on the lack of seniority in the ranks. Hashim Amla is notoriously reluctant to take charge, JP Duminy is the only other senior batsman and is in under severe pressure to retain his place, and Morne Morkel is the only quick to have played more than 50 Tests.Put another way, South Africa’s depth will be tested more than it ever has in England. Heino Kuhn and Aiden Markram are yet to be capped; Theunis de Bruyn has only Test to his name; Quinton de Kock, Keshav Maharaj and Kagiso Rabada have each played less than 20 Tests, and Temba Bavuma will play his 21st at Lord’s. The inexperience could be worrying but the potential is promising.Fifteen men have traveled from the southern tip of Africa to the upper edges of the northern hemisphere on a mission to prove their mettle. The next six weeks will give us a clue as to how many will return next time.

Lyon: most five-fors in Asia in 2017

The offspinner also has the most seven-fors by a visiting bowler in Tests in Asia

Gaurav Sundararaman05-Sep-20174 – Five-wicket hauls for Nathan Lyon in Asia this year – the most for any bowler in the region. Rangana Herath and Ravindra Jadeja have three each. Lyon has taken just 10 innings to get there. He now has 77 wickets in Asia – the second-most for an Australian. Shane Warne tops the list with 127 wickets.3 – Seven-wicket hauls for Lyon in Asia – the most for any visiting bowler in Tests. Lyon’s 7 for 94 was his second-best bowling figures in Tests. Along the way, he also became only the fourth spinner to take a seven-wicket haul against Bangladesh.0 – Wickets for Australia fast bowlers in the first innings in Chittagong, the first instance since 1989 where they haven’t struck in the first innings. Allan Border, Trevor Hohns and Peter Taylor took all 10 wickets against the West Indies then.2 – Consecutive fifty plus scores for David Warner in Asia. This is the first time he’s done this in the subcontinent. Warner now has three fifty plus scores from his last five Test innings in Asia. He had five from his previous 24 innings.18 – The number of consecutive series since debut where Steven Smith has scored at least one half-century. It’s the joint second-highest along with Len Hutton in the last 100 years. England’s Marcus Trescothick leads this pack with a half-century in each of the 22 Test series he was a part of.2 – Only twice have Australia passed 200 for the loss of no more than two wickets in Asia since 2008. 1 – Only one wicket has fallen to a Bangladesh fast bowler in the last four Tests at home. Mustafizur Rahman struck early on the second day in Chittagong to remove Matt Renshaw. Fifty eight of the sixty wickets Bangladesh have taken at home in the last four Tests have gone to the spinners.

Yasir's 150 in quick time

Yasir Shah became the quickest spinner in Test history to 150 wickets

Shiva Jayaraman28-Sep-2017
Yasir Shah became the quickest spinner in Test history in terms of number of matches played to take 150 Test wickets. Australia’s Clarrie Grimmett, also a legspinner like Yasir, was the previous quickest to the landmark having taken 28 matches. Three offspinners – South Africa’s Hugh Tayfield, Pakistan’s Saeed Ajmal and India’s R Ashwin – complete the top five.ESPNcricinfo LtdYasir is also the joint-second quickest bowler ever to take 150 wickets. His compatriot Waqar Younis also took 27 matches. The record for the quickest bowler to 150 wickets belongs to England’s Sydney Barnes, who took just 24 matches. Click here for a list of the quickest bowlers to 150 Test wickets.

Quickest bowlers to 150 wickets in Tests
Bowler Team Mat
Sydney Barnes England 24
Waqar Younis Pakistan 27
Yasir Shah Pakistan 27
Clarrie Grimmett Australia 28
Hugh Tayfield South Africa 29

In spite of bowling largely in conditions that haven’t always been helpful to spinners, Yasir manages to rank third among spinners who are the fastest in terms of the number of balls to collect 150 dismissals. He has taken just 15 deliveries more than the number of balls R Ashwin took to reach the landmark. Stuart MacGill is the quickest spinner having taken 8312 deliveries.

Quickest spinners to 150 Test wickets by deliveries
Bowler Team Deliveries
Stuart MacGill Australia 8312
R Ashwin India 8380
Yasir Shah Pakistan 8395

Yasir has achieved this milestone in just two years and 341 days from his Test debut. Only two other bowlers – England’s Graeme Swann and Australia’s Mitchell Johnson – have been quicker than Yasir in terms of time taken from debut to reach this landmark. While Johnson took just two years and 129 days from debut, Swann took two years and 250 days.

Quickest bowler to 150 Test wickets, time from debut
Bowler Team Time
Mitchell Johnson Australia 2 years, 139 days
Graeme Swann England 2 years, 250 days
Yasir Shah Pakistan 2 years, 341 days
Shane Warne Australia 2 years, 356 days
Ian Botham England 2 years, 362 days

Brace yourself for the most closely fought IPL yet

Riding over controversy, embracing change, the leading T20 league in the world is back a richer, bigger and better-represented tournament. And yet it is the closest it could be to the original product

Gaurav Sundararaman and Sidharth Monga06-Apr-2018Ten years later, riding over controversy, embracing change, the leading T20 league in the world is back a richer, bigger and better-represented tournament. And yet it is the closest it could be to the original product. After the self-brought trials and tribulations by two teams, we are back to the eight cities that played in the first season in 2008. Gautam Gambhir and Yuvraj Singh are back with their home teams, Delhi Daredevils and Kings XI Punjab, and Shane Warne is back to his Cinderella XI, Rajasthan Royals. With everything changing around him, Virat Kohli becomes the only player to have represented the same franchise for 11 years. If it feels a little like travelling back in time in order to arrive at this future, there remains the same unpredictability the first season of IPL brought with it.ESPNcricinfo LtdOpen IPL means less margin for errorIt won’t be a surprise if this year’s edition is the closest fought. Expect a tight tussle for playoff spots in the last week of the league stage. Franchise owners have learnt from past mistakes at the auctions, and have become much smarter. As a result, this year’s teams are better balanced, and there is no clear favourite at the outset. It is hard to predict who is likely to make the playoffs.Less-fancied teams like Daredevils, Kings XI and Royal Challengers Bangalore have ensured they have plugged gaps in their XIs. Teams have enough bench strength to cover for players suffering injuries or leaving for international duty. In the past, it has taken teams about four-five games to identify the right combination and roles for their players. This year, they will have to be quicker.Homecoming for some captains, new adventure for othersT20 is a format in which coaches and analysts can have a bigger influence on the games, live, but everybody acknowledges it remains a sport where the captain is in charge. More so in the IPL because not only does he have to make a great number of crucial tactical decisions in little over three hours but also because he has to manage superstar egos from across the world and make disparate units work together with hardly any time for team-building. We have enough instances from previous editions where captains have failed and have been removed mid-season.The experienced MS Dhoni, Gambhir and Rohit Sharma – seven titles won under their captaincy – will look to implement strategies that worked for them and add to their silverware while Kohli will need to find that extra something to take his side past the final hurdle for a first time. Not surprisingly, Indian captains have led seven of the 10 successful campaigns, but the Australians have left a significant mark too, with three wins. However, with David Warner and Steven Smith pulled out at the last minute, there is opportunity new leaders – R Ashwin, Dinesh Karthik, Ajinkya Rahane and Kane Williamson – to make their mark.This is their first IPL season as full-time captains. All four of them have had moderate careers in the shortest format. Williamson and Ashwin were not even regular starters for their IPL sides in the last two years. Rahane and Karthik are only just starting to find their way back to regular spots in India’s limited-overs sides. All four will need to justify not only their team results but also their own individual spots in the XI.Karthik and Williamson have some experience in captaining their state and national sides and are in a better position to fill the big shoes of Gambhir and Warner. There have not been many bowler-captains in the IPL, and so it will be interesting to see how Ashwin goes about his job. He is touted to be one of the most astute cricketers India has produced and his first challenge will be to help Kings XI make the playoffs. Rahane showed promising signs in his only Test as a captain for India, and will look to carry forward similar ideas with a revamped Royals outfit. He will have an IPL winner in Warne helping him out.ESPNcricinfo LtdUmpire’s howler is not finalThe IPL has never been at a threat of falling behind other leagues when it comes to entertainment, strategy and tactics, but some of the umpiring in the tournament has provided its fans derision-filled pleasure and has also turned matches on their head. But finally, after 10 years, the IPL has introduced DRS. It is a new element especially for the number of non-international players who have no experience of using the system. Franchises need to make a decision on who will take the call considering some batsmen and even the wicketkeeper could be entirely new to DRS.Another less significant but necessary fallout is that the umpires will now have to change the signal for the strategic timeouts. The “T” symbol will be used for DRS as is the norm in international cricket. To announce a strategic timeout, the umpires will now point to their wrist with raised hands. This is the signal used for the final hour of play in first-class cricket.Mid-season transfersThe likes of B Aparajith and Jaydev Shah will be disappointed they are not part of this year’s IPL. They have been warming the benches for many seasons without getting a game. With the introduction of mid-season transfers this year, teams can trade uncapped cricketers who have not played more than two games with other franchises. While this adds a new dimension to team composition and strategy, will anyone be comfortable releasing a player privy to their strategies and tactics to an opponent? In a tournament that lasts only two months and 14 games per team, it will be surprising to see if teams really use this option.Wristspin is in, but is fingerspin out?Once an art under threat in cricket – because of its large margin for error – wristspin is back in a big way. Every limited-overs side in the world wants one. More wickets have fallen to wristspinners (217) than fingerspinners (192) in the last two IPL seasons. The top five ranked bowlers in T20Is are wristspinners. Five of the eight attacks this season are built around wristspin. Yet the really good fingerspinners have still managed to survive.In the recently concluded Nidahas Trophy, Washington Sundar showed there is a lifeline for fingerspinners. Often bowling in the Powerplay, he showed lack of turn can be made up with discipline and sharp knowledge of both his own game and the batsmen’s as well. There will be roles for Ashwin – not least as captain of Kings XI, his team-mate Axar Patel, Dhoni’s trusted Ravindra Jadeja and Shahbaz Nadeem, who has an excellent economy-rate across seasons. Could this be the year that fingerspinners strike back?Home is where the advantage isRoyal Challengers will not want a repeat of last season’s performance. One of the primary reasons for their loss was the pitches were slow and turning and did not suit the brand of attacking cricket they usually play. Kohli, AB de Villiers, Quinton De Kock and the rest will hope that issue has been addressed. It is highly important to maximise home advantage in a tight league. A perfect home record can more often than not be enough to qualify for the playoffs. This season could actually boil down to whether teams are able to win away from home.Expect slow pitches in Chennai to suit their spinners and an aging batting lineup. With Warner out, it will be logical for Hyderabad too to prepare bowler-friendly conditions to suit their attack. On the other hand, a top-heavy Daredevils, perhaps the most aggressive batting line-up this year, will prefer flat pitches that help them go hard from ball one. Eden Gardens has offered pace and swing over the last two seasons, and Knight Riders have structured their squad to exploit that. And a challenge awaits Kings XI and Royals, who have not had a stable home over the years and have not been able to ascertain what exactly their home advantage is.They said they’ll be backChennai has been buzzing over the last 10 days. One of the first teams to strike a chord with the city it represented is back. The big crowds at their training session, outside their hotels, and following the team bus, Dhoni holding back tears when talking about Super Kings’ training sessions: all of it tells you how much Super Kings mean to the city of Chennai. The first IPL champions, Royals, are back too, with promise of similar out-of-the-box thinking that heralded their surprise success.Both teams have managed to retain a few of their past players and are raring to start the season. Super Kings’ played their practice matches in front packed stands, and the tickets for their first home game are sold out. Dhoni will be leading a side after two years and will want to ensure the CSK continue their 100% record of making the playoffs. Royals have revamped their support staff and will be hoping the new overseas recruits – Ben Stokes, Jos Buttler, D’Arcy Short and Jofra Archer – deliver for them. Traditionally known as the “Moneyball” team, they have now picked up the two costliest players at the auction.

From Nick Compton to Mark Stoneman: England's opening merry-go-round

It has been nearly six years since England had a long-term stable opening partnership in Test cricket

George Dobell30-May-20181 Nick Compton

2012-13 (and 2016)

  • Tests as opener: 10
    100s: 2. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 117
    Average: 31.12

Back-to-back centuries in New Zealand suggested Compton had what it takes as a Test opener. But he never again reached 20 as an opener and was dropped ahead of the 2013 Ashes. Perhaps with more sensitive man-management, he might have fared better, but when recalled for a stint at No. 3 (he had one more innings as an opener), he again started well and then faded.2 Joe RootGetty Images

2013 (and 2016)

  • Tests as opener: 6
    100s: 1. 50s: 2
    Highest score: 180
    Average: 41.70

Promoted to open in the 2013 Ashes, Root made one memorable century at Lord’s – during which he was dropped early – but otherwise only passed 30 once in the series. In retrospect it was a premature elevation for a man still learning his trade. After briefly losing his place at the end of the 2013-14 Ashes, he returned to establish himself as one of the best middle-order players in the world. Briefly returned, with success, to the top of the order in the Mohali Test when Haseeb Hameed was indisposed.3 Michael CarberryGetty Images

2013-14

  • Tests as opener: 6

  • 100s: 0. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 60
    Average: 28.75

One of the more unfortunate players on this list, five of Carberry’s six Tests came against an outstanding Australia attack featuring Mitchell Johnson at his best and Ryan Harris not far from his. Carberry performed as well as anyone: he faced more balls than any England player in the series and only Kevin Pietersen scored more runs. But having passed 50 only once, he was dropped as England looked to rebuild at the end of the series.4 Sam RobsonPA Photos

2014

  • Tests as opener: 7
    100s: 1. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 127
    Average: 30.54

Born in Sydney but with a mother from Nottinghamshire, Robson represented Australia Under-19s before committing his future to England. A century in his second Test promised much but some uncertainty around off stump – he was bowled four times and caught in the cordon five times in 11 Test innings – undermined his progress. He was dropped at the end of the 2014 English season, having failed to reach 40 in his final four Tests.5 Jonathan TrottGetty Images

2015

  • Tests as opener: 4
    100s: 0. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 64
    Average: 19.37

An ill-fated return as opening batsman in the Caribbean in early 2015 never threatened to work out. Although he made one half-century in helping Cook post an opening stand of 125 in Grenada, Trott was dismissed for three ducks and two other scores under 10 in six innings. He later admitted he knew he was “screwed” as soon as he walked out to bat in the first Test of the series, with the anxiety issues that had previously plagued him returning with a vengeance.6 Adam LythGetty Images

2015

  • Tests as opener: 7
    100s: 1. 50s: 0
    Highest score: 107
    Average: 20.38

Like Robson, Lyth also made a century in his second Test – in front of his Yorkshire faithful at Headingley, no less. But he was unable to kick on from that solid beginning. He only reached 20 once more and never again passed 40 – his next highest score of 37 came in the opening Test of that summer’s Ashes, in Cardiff. Increasingly loose outside off stump, he averaged just 12.77 in the series.7 Moeen AliMoeen Ali helped England reach the close on 56 without loss•Getty Images

2015-16

  • Tests as opener: 3
    100s: 0. 50s: 0
    Highest score: 35
    Average: 14

Moeen’s promotion from No. 8 (he had actually batted at 9 in two of the final three Ashes innings of August 2015) was always likely to prove testing, but with England looking for a way to squeeze a second spinner into the side for their three-match series in the UAE, Moeen was – as ever – the man asked to compromise. He started well enough, adding 116 with Cook in the first innings of the series, but from there his form and confidence fell away sharply. In five other innings he failed to reach 25.8 Alex HalesGetty Images

2015-16

  • Tests as opener: 11
    100s: 0. 50s: 5
    Highest score: 94
    Average: 27.28

After a tricky start against South Africa, there were times Hales seemed close to cracking it in Test cricket. Three times in five innings he passed 80 against Sri Lanka without converting to that elusive maiden century. He was also never quite able to convert the fluency of his limited-overs cricket to the longer game, and after averaging 18.12 in the four-Test series against Pakistan, the selectors let it be known that he would not have been taken to Bangladesh even if he had not opted out of the tour due to security fears. With the opportunities available to him (and the demands placed upon him) in limited-overs cricket it is entirely possible that future Test opportunities will elude him.9 Ben DuckettAFP

2016-17

  • Tests as opener: 2
    100s: 0. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 56
    Average: 23

Promoted on the back of an outstanding county season, Duckett’s struggles demonstrated how great the divide between Division Two of the county championship and Test cricket has grown. He was perhaps unfortunate to make his debut on tracks offering substantial assistance to spin bowlers but some technical flaws were soon exploited and though he made one fine, counterattacking half-century before being moved down the order, it was an exciting rather than secure innings. He is young and talented enough to come again.10 Haseeb HameedGetty Images

2016-17

  • Tests as opener: 3
    100s: 0. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 82
    Average: 32

By the time the India tour finished, it looked likely that Hameed would be installed as Cook’s opening partner for years to come. He had, after all, set a new highest score for a teenager in Test cricket for England (and only missed out on a century on debut as he attempted to up the pace and set up a declaration) and demonstrated both technique and temperament while batting 50 overs for 25 as England battled for a draw in Vizag. Arguably his best innings was made at No. 8 after sustaining a badly broken finger, but it was made, in part, against the new ball and demonstrated a wider range of strokes than had been apparent before. He endured a horrid start to the County Championship season though – he didn’t register a first-class half-century until August – and the selectors reasoned it may do him more harm than good to expose him to the South Africa attack. You’d still expect him to be back sooner rather than later, though.11 Keaton JenningsGetty Images

2016-17

  • Tests as opener: 6
    100s: 1. 50s: 1
    Highest score: 112
    Average: 24.50

Called up following an outstanding domestic season (in which he scored more Division One runs than anyone), an injury to Hameed and the loss of form of Duckett, Jennings made a century on debut in Mumbai having been dropped before he had scored. He made 54 in the next match, too, but back in England his difficulties around off stump were exposed and he averaged just 15.87 (without a half-century) in the four-match series against South Africa. He was dropped before the West Indies series but recalled less than a year later.12 Mark StonemanGetty Images

2017-18

  • Tests as opener: 11
    100s: 0. 50s: 5
    Highest score: 60
    Average: 27.68

The 12th man to open with Cook since the retirement of Strauss, Stoneman owed his call-up to some consistent form in county cricket – 2017 was the fifth successive season in which he has registered 1,000 first-class runs – and, it has to be said, the failure of almost all other competitors. He was the oldest specialist batsman to win an England Test debut this century. The early signs were promising as he fought hard but, whether by coincidence or not, from the moment he was struck by a bouncer at the WACA the returns diminished. A brace of unconvincing fifties in New Zealand earned him the first chance this season, but Lord’s was an awful experience for him.*Individual records reflect innings played as opening batsmen only. This is an updated version of a story first run on December 7,
2016 when Keaton Jennings was called up

West Indies' terrible run with bat in India continues

Stats highlights from the first Test in Rajkot, which ended inside three days

Bharath Seervi06-Oct-20180- Number of bigger wins for India in Tests than the victory by an innings and 272 runs in Rajkot. In their last home game, against Afghanistan in June, they won by an innings and 262 runs, which was their previous largest victory. For West Indies, this was their second-largest defeat. Their largest defeat is by an innings and 283 runs, coming against England in Leeds in 2007.ESPNcricinfo Ltd593- Total number of balls West Indies’ both innings lasted for, which is their fewest in any Test against India where they lost all 20 wickets. They had faced 614 balls in the Mumbai Test in November 2013, which was their previous fewest.191- West Indies’ average total against India in their last six Test innings in India – the two Tests in 2013-14 tour and this one. Their totals have been 234, 168, 182, 187, 181 and 196. Their average runs per wicket of 19.13 is second worst behind South Africa, among all visiting teams to have played more than one Test in India in last five years.6- Number of India players to win the Man of the Match award on their Test debut. Prithvi Shaw became the sixth such player. Pravin Amre, RP Singh, R Ashwin, Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma were the first five. Incidentally, Ashwin and Rohit had also made their debuts against West Indies.468- India’s lead in the first innings against West Indies in Rajkot was their third biggest in Tests. Their biggest first-innings lead is 492 against Bangladesh in Dhaka in 2007. The second biggest is also against West Indies – 478 at Eden Gardens in 2011-12.ESPNcricinfo Ltd2- Number of first-innings deficits bigger than the 468 runs in this Test for West Indies. Their biggest deficit was 563 against England in a timeless Test in Kingston in 1930. Overall, the 468-run deficit is the 13th biggest for any team in Test cricket.5- Number of times India have enforced a follow-on since 2016, the most among all teams. They have done it twice against West Indies and Sri Lanka, and once against Afghanistan. England and South Africa have enforced follow-ons three times in this period, and Pakistan once. No other team has enforced a follow-on.35- Runs scored by West Indies’ top-five batsmen in their first innings, their lowest in an innings against India. None of their top five batsmen passed 20 in this innings.7- Kuldeep Yadav became the seventh bowler to achieve the feat of taking five-wicket hauls in all three international formats. He had taken five-fors in ODIs and T20Is before and completed the set with a five-for in the second innings of the Rajkot Test. In fact, he has taken all these five-wicket hauls this year. Bhuvneshwar Kumar is the only other India bowler to have completed this set.20- Number of sixes hit in the Rajkot Test, which is the joint-most in a Test in India. There were 20 sixes hit also in the Brabourne Test of 2009-10 involving Sri Lanka. India batsmen hit 11 sixes and West Indies nine in this match.

Why selection in India is not illogical or capricious, contrary to popular opinion

There is a clear, sound and well settled pattern to how the country’s national sides are selected

Kartikeya Date10-Feb-2019Selection is among the most difficult and essential parts of cricket. It is essential because elite cricket, be it international or franchise-based, is an exclusive contest in which only the very best can compete and from which others who are not as good must be excluded.It is difficult for two reasons. First, it is strictly impossible for selectors to ever be . A correct answer implies that, beyond argument, all other answers are wrong, or that they are measurably incorrect in different ways. Second, selectorial decisions affect the professional lives of others.The key feature of a game – which is an example of a “closed system”, or one that is separated from the world at large – is that its rules are precisely known. For instance, chess is governed by a set of rules that are precise and complete. If you removed one of those rules, or added other rules, you would no longer have chess. At any given point in a chess game, the player whose turn it is has a finite number of possible moves that they can make. This set of possible moves is completely known. It is a very large set but finite; this is why computers can play chess.So also, a game of cricket is not just governed but constituted by a set of Laws. Between them, these laws specify all possibilities in cricket. The laws governing closed systems, such as games, are arbitrary. There isn’t a natural reason for why the rules governing chess or cricket are as they are – they are made up arbitrarily. Closed systems are impossible to achieve when the rules that are to govern them require justification. (Formally, this is due to a well-understood difficulty known as the problem of induction.)The criteria chosen for selecting cricketers require justification. You could say, for example, that batting averages are relevant to selecting cricketers. But you cannot conclusively show, beyond argument, that they are the only relevant criterion, or, if they are one of the relevant criteria, exactly how relevant each of these criteria is. This is why any selection can be questioned reasonably.Selection decisions cause more anxiety and resentment among cricket fans than any other aspect of the game. The competence and motives of selectors are routinely questioned. So much so that at one point the BCCI stopped holding press conferences where journalists could question selectors about the team that they had selected. As shown above, it’s impossible to the selection of any player conclusively.The only possible approach to any selection process is trial and error. Selectors have to assume that certain criteria are relevant, and exercise judgement – of different types. The type of judgement required to drop a player is not the same as that called upon when selecting a player. For one thing, in the former case, the team management’s experience with the player is a criterion.So how are Indian teams, and specifically batsmen, selected? Unlike, say, fast bowling, India has a rich tradition of producing top-quality batsmen, and a clear, fairly well settled pattern is evident in the way Indian batsmen are selected. In the rest of this article, I will try and reconstruct the logical sequence as it is evident from selections to the Indian limited-overs and Test batting teams.The holy grail for selectors is the outstanding batting candidate. When a player is obviously better than other candidates, picking that player is an easy decision. For instance, consider a teenager who looks completely at home in the Ranji Trophy. Sachin Tendulkar was such a player. Recently, Prithvi Shaw has been such a player. Shaw, like Tendulkar, has so far been the outstanding player at every level at which he has competed. His Test debut was, unsurprisingly, a triumph. Whether he goes on to fulfil his promise remains to be seen, but the selectors have clearly identified him as an outstanding prospect.Absent this type of clear superiority, the second type of player the selectors look for is the batsman who is clearly too good for the Ranji-Trophy level and looks like a potential Test player. This becomes evident from the speed and certainty of the player’s run-making in first-class cricket over a period of time – not from one great season among a number of average seasons; it becomes evident from relentless run-scoring.The great example of this was VVS Laxman, who made his first-class debut, for Hyderabad against Punjab in the 1992-93 season. It was the only game he played that season. His second Ranji Trophy match was in the 1993-94 season, against Kerala. He did not go past 21 runs in his first four first-class innings, yet he played for South Zone in the Duleep Trophy in the 1994-95 season. That year, the Duleep Trophy was played before the Ranji Trophy. After his Duleep Trophy debut, Laxman played the full season for Hyderabad and made two centuries and a 96. He made his Test debut when South Africa toured India in 1996-97.Contrary to popular perception, Laxman was not picked in the Test team on the back of mountains of first-class runs. Rather, his early career suggests that he was rated as a potential India prospect very early on. As is the case in any reasonably good line-up, the most desired spots – numbers three, four and five – were not immediately available to him. He batted at six or as opener and did not score a Test hundred in his first 29 Test innings, which spanned seven Test series. His 30th Test innings was 167, in Sydney. However, in these years, he was making mountains of runs in domestic cricket. In 30 innings in the Ranji Trophy during the 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-00 seasons, Laxman made 13 centuries, including two triple-hundreds.By the end of that 2000 season, he had a modest Test career. But he also had an outstanding domestic career. The traditional way to put this is to say that he made it impossible for the selectors to ignore him. He “broke the door down”, as the saying goes. What he really did was to demonstrate that he was clearly too good for the Ranji Trophy level. He proved right the selectors at various levels who thought he was a potential Test player.This is a classic pattern in the careers of most India players. Experienced, expert eyes identify that these players are potential Test-quality players. Typically, they demonstrate that they are too good for the Ranji Trophy.The table below shows the first-class batting records (excluding Test cricket) of the most prolific batsmen in India. With a few exceptions all of them have had Test careers, and all of them have been repeatedly picked for India.

Beyond the obvious Test candidate, and the potential Test candidate, a third category exists, because it is not always possible to find the required number of players (the average Test squad has seven or eight batsmen) who fall into the first two categories. There are always two or three spots for which there are half a dozen or so equally strong candidates. This is where selection is at its most controversial, because this is where a choice has to be made among a number of more or less equal candidates. These candidates tend to be selected from the ranks of experienced Ranji Trophy campaigners. Alternatively, these candidates are selected based on form. These players also tend to be older than players in the first two categories.In the last 50 years, 65 specialist batsmen (wicketkeepers and allrounders are excluded) have made their Test debuts for India, from Gundappa Viswanath in November 1969, to Mayank Agarwal in December 2018. The median number of first-class games played by these 65 batsmen before their Test debut is 37. The player quickest to make his Test debut in the last 50 years was Dilip Vengsarkar. He played his first first-class match at the start of the 1975-76 domestic season, and within three months had made his Test debut, against New Zealand. Yuvraj Singh and Karun Nair played 37 first-class matches each before making their Test debuts.Of the 33 players who played at least 37 first-class matches prior to their Test debut, only 11 went on to score at least 1000 Test runs. Of the 33 players who played at most 37 first class matches each before making their Test debuts, 20 went on to score at least 1000 Test runs. The former list includes Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane, Shikhar Dhawan and Gautam Gambhir. Of these, Pujara and Rahane arguably had to wait longer than they otherwise might have in another era, due to India’s exceptional Test-match middle order of the late 2000s.Test batsmen in India are not selected purely because they score runs in the Ranji Trophy. Rather, the Ranji runs serve to confirm promise identified by expert eyes. All the successful Indian Test batsmen share a common trait. They are likely to be identified as international prospects quite early in their cricket careers. Their domestic record demonstrates that they are too good for domestic cricket and belong at a higher level.When considered according to their age at Test debut, the most successful Test batsmen who played for India have been 23 or younger. Three-fourths of the 65 specialist batsmen who have made debuts for India in the last 50 years have done so before the age of 25. The remaining 25%, who debuted after their 25th birthdays, did not fare well in Test cricket, as the table below shows.

The availability of an opening in the batting line-up obviously plays a part. Between Laxman’s debut in January 1996 and S Badrinath’s in February 2010, only four batsmen debuted in India’s middle orderv- Vijay Bharadwaj (October 1999), Hemang Badani (June 2001), Virender Sehwag (November 2001) and Yuvraj (October 2003). Of these, Badani opened the batting in his debut innings (he batted at six in the second), Sehwag went on to become a prolific Test opener, and Yuvraj became the established alternate whenever Tendulkar, Dravid, Ganguly or Laxman were unavailable.Until recently the Indian limited-overs side was selected in much the same way as the Test team was, from the same pool of players. The ability to make the jump from the standard of domestic cricket to international cricket has been the major consideration. This is what motivated the selection of Rohit Sharma to the limited-overs sides and the decision to ask him to open the batting – a spectacular success. But recently India have made some interesting selections for the limited-overs middle order. Kedar Jadhav and Dinesh Karthik are not in the picture for the Test team, but their selection to the limited-overs sides is more than a hunch.Of the 54 batsmen who have scored at least 1500 runs in domestic limited-overs cricket in the last ten years, the three outstanding players (highlighted in the chart below), based on a combination of batting average (a measure of consistency) and strike rate (a measure of power), are Yusuf Pathan, Jadhav and Karthik. Pathan is already 36, and last played for India in 2012. Karthik and Jadhav are likely to feature in India’s middle order at the World Cup.Kartikeya DateJudgement is inescapably required for selection. A system of selection that eliminates the requirement for someone to exercise judgement, and is provably superior to all other systems, is logically impossible. When it comes to selecting Test teams, the BCCI’s selection committees over the years have done a generally excellent job and have shown themselves to be expert judges.It is not the case that selection is only down to the appointed selectors. Rather, the selectors merely sit at the helm of a vast grapevine that runs up from local clubs and schools to the state teams, through former players and umpires. You saw evidence of this grapevine recently when Virat Kohli observed that Shubman Gill was an outstanding prospect. You see it when Rahul Dravid speaks of the quality of talent in the India Under-19 squad. You see it at work when the selectors pick an 18-year-old opener for the Test team after only 14 first-class games. But most of its work occurs beyond the national team, at lower levels, either in first-class cricket or in age-group cricket at the national and state levels. It is a system that has emerged over decades.The discourse surrounding selection is often dominated by fractious, conspiratorial mutterings about how selectors are incompetent fools who play favourites, or worse, and are either weak (a charge levelled typically because selections appear to follow what the captain wants) or dictatorial (a charge levelled at other times, when selections appear to ignore what the captain wants). This is best seen as a manifestation of the stakes involved. But these mutterings do not provide a reasonable picture of what the selectors do, or what selection is like.It is in the nature of selection (as of life) that the selectors cannot escape being unfair to somebody, because selection is, at its core, an act of exclusion. There is always a “deserving candidate” who misses out. Indeed, if there isn’t, then the resulting team is unlikely to be very good. The number of deserving candidates who miss out on selection is directly proportional to the quality of the squad that is selected. Right now, when India are enjoying what is arguably their most successful period in their history, is a good time to point this out.

How Kane Richardson learned to stop worrying and love the game

According to Justin Langer, Richardson epitomises Australia’s transformation after a dismal 2018

Sidharth Monga13-Jun-2019Kane Richardson would have challenged Justin Langer if the Australia coach had told him to his face that he didn’t seem to have the bottle to come back and play for Australia again. Before the start of the World Cup, Langer used Richardson as an example of how far the Australia team had come in a year.Langer said he remembered a chat with Richardson after the tour of England last year where they lost each of the six internationals. This was after the only T20I following the 5-0 whitewash in the ODI series. Langer, used to winning a lot when he played for Australia and when he coached Perth Scorchers, wasn’t quite impressed with the team he had. Richardson had gone for 59 runs in his four overs in that game. On the next tour that Richardson went to – in Zimbabwe – he didn’t get a single game, which told him where he stood with Langer.”I’m thinking about someone like Kane Richardson who I sat with after the T20 game last year and I never thought he’d play cricket for Australia again,” Langer said before the start of this World Cup. “I didn’t think he had the bottle and we talked about it but how he has come on and you see he is having a red hot dip here. Everything he does, whether it’s at training, he’s talked about it to the group, he doesn’t want to play scared cricket, he wants to be an Australian cricketer, he’s a great role model for our players to come from where we were 12 months ago, he’s standing tall and he’s having a go.”Richardson had to wait nine months for his next appearance for Australia, and he still didn’t make it to the original World Cup squad. It was an injury to Jhye Richardson that got him in, and a green track in overcast Taunton that finally got him a World Cup match. He didn’t have great List A numbers in between – averaging 43.5 and conceding runs at 6.21 to the over – but it could be his T20 performances that got him back into the mix. He averaged 17.7 and conceded runs at 7.75 an over in the BBL, which is quite acceptable.Most importantly, though, Richardson gave up worrying about selection and started believing in himself. “Since then – it will sound silly – I have just gone and stopped caring about selection,” Richardson said. “You just go back and do your best. And I think that’s what happened in the end. I took some wickets. All of a sudden, a few blokes fall down and you are the next one in. Yeah I just kind of gave up all – kind of – thought about it and just played cricket.”Langer didn’t actually let Richardson know what he thought of him. “He didn’t say it that time,” Richardson said. “I would have been pretty upset. Not so much upset, but I would have challenged him, I reckon. Any time some questions your bottle – as he said – I am pretty strong in my competitiveness. Just good to read and know that he thought that and now he thinks … it is quite positive. At the time I was pretty disappointed in my performance, and I knew something had to change.”Langer has seen a completely transformed Richardson on this trip. “It was just about believing in himself,” Langer said. “He is a really talented athlete. He has great skills. He is a beautiful athlete. He can field well, catch well, but when you are just holding back a little bit – maybe I won’t go for that because I don’t want to mess it up – now he is having a dip and a red-hot crack at it.”Richardson himself never believed he was done playing for Australia, but he wouldn’t have beaten himself up had he not. “I kind of stopped caring about it,” Richardson said. “There is no point worrying about it. I just thought well if I do never end up playing again, then so be it. I will do everything I can to play but it is what it is. All I can do is do my best, and that’s it.”

The pain of Wahab and Hamid, in victory and defeat

A match riddled with political tension off the field was eventually won by a player who wasn’t going to be there when the Afghanistan captain’s gamble failed

Sidharth Monga at Headingley30-Jun-2019Wahab Riaz should be on a vacation. He wasn’t picked in Pakistan’s original 30. He wasn’t in the World Cup training camp. He wasn’t even in the XV originally named for this World Cup. Somebody in the camp told him to not book his holiday because you never know with Pakistan cricket. This is a mix of foresight and defeatism that makes Pakistan cricket. Anything can happen anytime; no player or no situation can be ruled out.Sometimes Wahab must wish he was on vacation. It is Taunton. Pakistan are wasting ideal new-ball conditions, but Wahab comes on and immediately draws an edge. Aaron Finch is dropped at slip. He comes back later to have David Warner edging to third man, and he is dropped, too.Wahab comes to field at long-on for the next over. He is received by a crowd that tries to tell him through an applause that they understand. Nobody can really. Sometimes fast bowlers don’t even know where they are between overs. They field on auto-pilot. This Wahab is angry. His heart-rate is up. He has had a catch dropped. Consolation won’t work. He has seen this movie before, at the last World Cup. Someone from the crowd gives him an elderly-sounding advice, “” [Don’t let this get you down]. Nothing has registered on Wahab, who keeps following the routine of moving with the shot, then stepping over the rope between balls and then stepping back in to field.How can he not let this get him down? At least four more catches are dropped off his bowling in the tournament, making it an average of one per game. His average after six games is 42.25 and economy rate 6.54. Even Mohammad Amir, for whom the wheel has turned this tournament, has dropped a catch off Wahab. That’s how union leaders must feel when one of their own sells out to the management.On the eve of their third must-win match in a row, Wahab has sustained a fracture at the base of the little finger on his right hand. He should not be playing, but the same foresight and pragmatism tells them they will make the decision at the ground. Before the morning warm-ups, he is asked if he can bear the pain. Wahab has a crazy decision to make: he wants to be brave but he also needs to be honest because you can’t be a liability at a crucial juncture.

****

Wahab says he wants to have a bowl before he decides. After bowling a few deliveries, Wahab tells Sarfaraz Ahmed he can commit a 100% to bowling but can’t promise the same with his batting and fielding. Sarfaraz asks him again if he can bowl. Wahab says he can. Sarfaraz doesn’t think twice. He is in. Wahab feels twice the player. That his captain wants him in desperately.Still you know where this will end up if Pakistan fail.Related

  • Imad Wasim and Wahab Riaz's heroics keep Pakistan alive

  • 'He's come a long way' – Hamid Hassan's still got it, and he isn't giving it away

  • Wahab Riaz dreamed he would be picked for the World Cup. And then he was

Hamid Hassan is now a commentator. He is helping the term [Pashto for ‘six’] go mainstream with his excitable commentary. This is February in India, and time for shpageezas is over. The Test match is upon us. Every lunch break, Hamid changes out of his suit into training gear, and goes and works with the Afghanistan trainer and physio. He has not played an ODI since July 2016.It is easy to assume Hamid is retired. Take a look at what all he has gone through in life since 2012. Part of an ensemble Associates and Affiliates XI facing the No. 1 Test side England back in 2012, Hamid bowled an unbroken 11-over spell to get the wickets of Andrew Strauss and Jonathan Trott. Soon he chased a ball in vain so hard he left himself no choice but to jump over the picket fence. His right foot sailed over, but his left got stuck and he landed knee first on the sightscreen’s rail grill. It was such an almighty fall that witnesses feared for his life.Hamid had to then undergo surgery, which took all the strength out of his heavy muscular legs. With no one to guide him, Hamid overworked himself too soon in a bid to come back, bringing about another surgery. Offers started to come his way to join the ACB, but he wanted to be back. He was done, everyone said. Hamid would watch Rocky and Rambo movies, and train like them. He was not yet ready to trade the headband and the face paint for a suit and a tie.On June 29, as Wahab is going through his dilemma on whether to play or not, Hamid has decided this will be his last ODI. Nobody outside of the team knows. It is only after the lunch break when Afghanistan come out to defend 227 that you get to know through that guard of honour for Hamid. One of the faces of Afghanistan cricket is going out without fanfare, but he wants to win them one last match. This is a turning track, and he knows on such tracks his side has the best limited-overs spin attack in the world. He needs to support them.”I was very very keen and very happy,” Hamid says. “I was playing my last ODI and was in very good mood. I bowled a very good first over with pace. I was ready to go…”

****

Gulbadin Naib can read and write Urdu. He is still learning to write his own language Pashto. He was born in Pakistan. He was 11 when he realised he was an Afghan and not a Pakistani. When in India, he did interviews for written pieces in Urdu, and spoke passionately of an Afghan identity. He said he was thankful his children were growing up in Afghanistan, at home. When in front of the cameras at this World Cup, this last-minute captain of Afghanistan has not spoken Urdu at all. Except for one couplet, which we will come back to.Hamid Hasan appears to have pulled his left hamstring as Imam-ul-Haq and Babar Azam take a run•Getty ImagesThis tells you a lot about the geopolitics of the region. Afghans want an identity of their own. They learnt their cricket in Pakistan, but they didn’t go there out of free will. Pakistan played a big role in their being refugees. They acknowledge their past but they don’t want to be stuck with it. Current players respect that, but former ones in the media don’t. They proclaim Pakistan will “crush” Afghanistan.Back to the couplet. This one came out because Naib must not have found a translation in Pashto. He told Bangladesh, ” [We have already sunk, darlings, but we will drag you with us.]” Irony is, Bangladesh themselves fought against the imposition of Urdu (and Punjabi) when they sought freedom from Pakistan. Those lines were perhaps better reserved for those who understand Urdu.

****

Imad Wasim can appear to be what is called a ‘burger’ in Pakistan. A rich kid with an accent, detached from the realities of the country, that’s a working definition of a ‘burger’. Imad was born in Wales, and was set for a career in medicine when called up for the Pakistan Under-19s. He does have an accent, and uses the word “mate” to address fellow brown people. Far from being spoilt, he is the kind of honest allrounder who has to consistently keep punching above his weight to stay in the side. He is a spinner who doesn’t turn the ball. He is not a lusty hitter. He is not the most athletically built. Yet he is important in the side but also dispensable. Failure in first match, and he is the one dropped.Now back in the side, Imad has taken two big wickets and is watching a crazy old match unfold at Headingley as Pakistan look to chase 228 to keep a crazy old logic-defying run going. They have lost to West Indies and India, but they have beaten tournament favourites England, got the better of South Africa and ended the unbeaten run of New Zealand to keep their campaign alive. Afghanistan should be easy then. How I laugh.Hamid walks through the guard of honour but doesn’t join his team-mates immediately. He is getting some attention from the physio before he takes the field. It is his lower back. Hamid charges in to bowl the second over of the innings. The first ball kicks off the surface; it is quick, but the extra bounce makes it look quicker. He is feeling it. He is feeling good. He is going all out. He needs to help his spinners out. In his second over, he does his hamstring.”Suddenly I don’t know what happened, second over my hamstring was totally like gone. I felt like something was broken inside my hamstring. It wasn’t my wish to go like this,” Hamid says after the match. He is limping. He has given it all. He is done. He can break down into tears any moment. He still has two small Afghan flags painted on his cheeks. Rambo at twilight.Imad Wasim won Pakistan the game from a seemingly hopeless situation•Getty ImagesSay what you will about Naib and his sudden rise to captaincy, but he is not the one to shirk responsibility. He is a bit like Imad, always having to justify his place in the side. He doesn’t have the technique to open the batting, but he is doing it. He is not the ideal death bowler, but he is doing it. He is fronting up to the press every time even as their campaign unravels with off-field drama outdoing the number of close defeats. As soon as he sees Hamid limp during his second over, Naib starts to loosen up. It is the three spinners, though, who keep doing their job. In Samiullah Shinwari, Naib finds a fourth musketeer.It is a chaotic match. The geopolitical nastiness has made it to the stands. Already people have been evicted, but the relative calm has been disturbed with Pakistan losing two quick wickets, both against the run of play, both rocks of this batting order: Imam-ul-Haq and Babar Azam. The only men who bring about any certainty or predictability to Pakistan are both gone.There has been a quote going around these days that is being attributed to Ricky Ponting. That Pakistan beat whomever they want, and they lose to whomever they want. It’s not Pakistan v the opposition, but Pakistan v Pakistan. It can’t be ascertained if Ponting indeed said it, but that is exactly what Pakistan have done through those two wickets.ALSO READ: The Afghan heroism of Gulbadin NaibAll bets are off now. Every dot is waking up the Afghanistan crowd. That familiar feeling is back in the Pakistan camp. Mohammad Hafeez resists the temptation to get out to a part-timer again before cutting the first ball back from Mujeeb Ur Rahman in air. Haris Sohail gets a superb ball from Rashid Khan who is as illegible right now as Farsi, Afghanistan’s other strong language. Sarfaraz Ahmed, who anchored a similar chase against Sri Lanka in the 2017 Champions Trophy, runs himself out.Suddenly Naib’s words have come back to haunt the side that understands Urdu: We have already sunk, darlings, but we will drag you with us. Afghanistan have had a shot against all Asian sides, but have heartbreakingly fallen short. Afghanistan are the heartbreak of this tournament. They are unravelling in front of our eyes, but we – hampered by language – can’t even ascertain what is happening. There is a lot of politics, that much can be said. For the sake of Rashid, of Nabi, of Mujeeb, of fighting batsmen Rahmat and Najib, for the sake of current and former captain Naib and Asghar, for the outgoing affable coach Phil Simmons, we want them to win at least one game. But do we want the win to come at the expense of the greatest story of this World Cup?This is as good a chance as any for Afghanistan, though. They are defending a total unlike other games, which is the ideal scenario for them. Except that Imad is playing the smart game out there. He doesn’t care if he has to play out four maidens from Rashid. He doesn’t care if he keeps patting Mujeeb’s carrom balls back to him. He knows Hamid is injured, and someone quicker or a lesser spinner has to bowl his quota. He wants Afghanistan to make that choice: is it a quicker bowler or part-timer Samiullah? How long can they delay that decision?Naib makes that decision in the 46th over with 46 still to get. Out of the five remaining overs, three are locked in for Rashid and Mujeeb. Naib and Samiullah are the options for the other two. Naib knows Samiullah has bowled well, but he also knows Pakistan are going to target him now. He has had the experience of bowling at the death in this tournament. It’s not ideal, but Naib brings himself on. In his mind, Naib is doing the brave thing again.Imad picks his spot first ball and helps along a low full toss – a yorker gone wrong – into the leg side for four. Naib learns his lesson, rolls his fingers over the next one, Imad miscues the attempted shot over extra cover, Asghar runs after it, this is going to be a catch. What redemption it is for Naib. He can flex his biceps again. Sweet win at last. Except Asghar over-runs it. Asghar has been running and diving after everything, he has been helping Naib out with decision-making, but he has over-run this catch. Who else but Naib and Asghar to be at the centre of this heartbreak?Wahab Riaz connects with the defining blow of the match•Getty ImagesLater in the over, an outside edge flies away for four. Naib stands in the middle of the pitch, hands on knees, unable to believe what is happening. Eighteen runs come off the over. Now Rashid and Mujeeb have only 27 to defend in the last four. In the change rooms, Hamid is struggling to keep his emotions in check. If only he could give them two more overs at this stage, he is thinking.Naib finds a way to get back into the game again. In the 47th, he swoops in on what looks like a certain two, catches Shadab Khan unawares with a smooth quick return by the stumps to run him out. Once again, Afghanistan believe. Once again, Pakistan wonder if their belief – yakeen, if you will – is actually true.This is when Wahab Riaz gets up. He slides his right hand, finger broken and swollen, into a glove. He looks skywards and tells god it is up to him to give him [honour] or [dishonour]. He grimaces every time he grips the bat hard and taps it down.Imad is perhaps still not picking Mujeeb but he has decided he is going to bat through the innings. Hardly any risk is taken as they know they have one more weaker over to go. With 16 off 11, though, Wahab finds one in his wheelhouse. Rashid has overpitched with this wrong’un. Wahab gets on a knee and has an almighty swing. Naib at deep midwicket knows he can’t get to it. There is this almighty release of emotions. Pakistan believe they have got it, Afghanistan know they have not. Rioting breaks out in stands again. Punches, rubbish, bottles, and even a rubbish bin are thrown at each other.A chaotic finish to a chaotic match. Pakistan still believe. Afghanistan hold back tears. There is for Pakistan, but by no means it is for Afghanistan. At the press conference, Imad and Naib talk about their emotions one after the other. Both have found humour. It is slightly insensitive but that’s what keeps them going. About the pitch invasion, Naib says the people love their players, their heroes. It is very difficult to locate these heroes. They want to touch them, hug them at the only place they can see them. Let them. Imad jokes about heart attacks. Days after bowling coach Azhar Mahmood did about suicides. They both ask the fans to co-exist, to watch like brothers.In the mixed media zone, Wahab and Hamid stand a few feet apart as they talk about their day. Both are talking about their pain. Wahab can look back fondly. Hamid has only regret. Wahab promises he will bear the pain and turn out against Bangladesh too. Hamid has no other ODI to look forward to, but he will get into Rambo mode and train for another year or so of T20s. He limps off into the team bus.Now, if you excuse me, I’m going to go home and have a heart attack.

When Krunal Pandya's childhood friend watched Kohli bat on his former ground

Nisarg Chokshi was at the Central Broward Regional Park in Lauderhill for the first T20I, a venue where he has played various domestic tournaments

Peter Della Penna in Lauderhill04-Aug-2019When India visit just about any venue these days, the stands predictably turn into a sea of blue. But in South Florida on Saturday, it was tinged with shades of red and white too.Some of the more creative fans supporting India at this West Indies home affair on neutral soil paid homage to their dual heritage at the Central Broward Regional Park by sewing the Indian flag back-to-back with the stars and stripes of the USA. It was a highlight of the bond forged by the growing Indian diaspora not just in Florida but from all around the country who have driven long distances or flown in for this affair.Among those symbolizing this new wave of fans is Nisarg Chokshi. Growing up in Baroda, Chokshi was coached in Kiran More’s academy and played alongside Krunal Pandya at age-level cricket in Gujarat. But the family desire for better opportunities meant Chokshi moved to New Jersey as a 15-year-old in 2006. He stuck with cricket, and went on to captain the runner-up team in the national U-19 championship 2009, where he led future USA national team captain Muhammad Ghous.He couldn’t get picked for USA U-19 at the time because he was not eligible on the ICC residency, which required four years of residency at the time. He had only been in the country for three years, which is enough time these days. Chokshi now works as an engineer for the State of New Jersey.Chokshi has played at the Central Broward Regional Park on many occasions in various domestic tournaments in the USA, largely to cavernous echoes in the outfield where every conversation can be heard among the players in the middle because the crowds are non-existent. You can imagine his excitement when he flew down to sit in a fifth-row seat in the east grandstand to watch his childhood friend Krunal in front of a jam-packed crowd of 13,000.”I was just thinking this morning – this is the same pitch where I have batted, the same ground where I have played my cricket for years where Virat Kohli is going to be batting today, where the legends are going to be playing,” Chokshi said. “It’s just unbelievable, it’s just a dream come true to see that the same exact pitch where you have scored is where the international cricketers are right now. My childhood friend, we used to be in the same academy so I’m supporting him all the way from India as well.”But this weekend is not just about Chokshi reuniting with Krunal. It’s a chance for his parents and wife Apeksha residing in New Jersey to reconnect with his sister Risham and her husband Shailin, who flew 3,300 miles from Seattle. It’s also the very first match for the next generation of the Chokshi clan, Nisarg and Apeksha’s six-month old Aaryav.”We also want him to make sure cricket comes first before any sport for us because his dad always played cricket,” Apeksha said. “I would love to see my son playing for USA.”While there has plenty of discussion about the struggles of American administrators to reach out and connect with people beyond the South Asian and West Indian diaspora to get involved in the game, it has been no less difficult to keep both sets of core ethnic groups engaged to serve as a foundational building block to expand from. But Chokshi and his young first-generation Indian-American family show there is hope that may be changing.After getting a taste of the action between India and West Indies on Saturday, Chokshi was excited to learn about the impending debut of ODIs on American soil between USA and Papua New Guinea next month. Though the crowds in Lauderhill to watch USA will most likely be a fraction of what is on display for the T20Is between India and West Indies, the naturalized American-citizen Chokshi said he wouldn’t hesitate to come back to support USA.”I would fly down to support my country,” Chokshi said. “This is my first T20I that I’m watching in the United States. I’m probably gonna come more and more. The stadium is fantastic. This brings cricket in the limelight in the United States and it’s a great boost for the country as well. This is the best sport in the world. It’s history-making. This is just the beginning. USA will go big.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus